Vampire Hunter D and Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust are two classic Gothic anime movies. Both are based on a book series by Hideyuki Kikuchi, about a future Earth where vampires rule the night.
They are hunted by men, but one hunter stands out among the rest: the dhampir (half-vampire) D.
Story & Characters
Note: This review is for the original Vampire Hunter D movie, based off the
first novel.
I base the plot, characters, music, etc. on the time the novel was written and the anime was released.
What science fiction loving person can resist a post-apocalyptic world filled with humans, mutants, and vampires? The
main character, "D", is the most handsome, elegant, and shady vampire hunter that ever lived. D is what they
call a dhampir, a half-human/half-vampire. Rejected by humans and vampires alike, D struggles with his dark secret and
saving a girl from a monster. The story encompasses D's protection of a human farm girl who has been given the
"kiss of the nobility." The movie does not go into depth as much as the novel in D's internal struggle
in finding his place in this world, but it does get the basic story through. The characters are interesting and you can
have sympathy for their struggles, but the movie as a whole tends to leave a dry taste in a high-geared-anime-loving
mouth.
The story kept me interested, even though I knew how the story would come out. Its a classic everyone should see once,
just to see how visionary the creators were for that time period. The over used post-apocalyptic theme has just been
overdone too many times now days. Because of this, it makes many viewers less likely to watch it because anime now
seems to go through cycles of re-hashing the same theme over and over again. You've also got the common story of
the overly powerful hero (the fact that he's so pretty even men think he's attractive is pretty modern for its
time) that must protect the weaker, yet strong willed heroine from the clutches of evil. You've also got that
combined with the half-breed taboo which makes it something we've all heard of before. Girls, who at one time
dreamt of a knight in armor coming to my rescue, will most likely enjoy the story. Guys might not care as much because
personally there weren't enough battles and the action sequences went by too quickly.
Overall, the entire story progresses slowly, mostly because it was based off of the book and they wanted some serious
character development. I found this to be the most impressive about the movie, considering how much anime lacks that
extra effort now.
Rating: 5
Art
The art from the movie is what you'd expect from a low budget film of its time. There is not much neither you, nor
they can do about it. If I remember correctly, when asked about the original movie, Hideyuki Kikuchi has said that he
wished they could've done it better (artwork, design), but for the time you couldn't ask for more than what
they were capable of. They did make the effort to base the D's character designs off of the book, but
unfortunately they did not make the same effort for the rest of the characters. To me, that was a major disappointment.
Because of this, the fiends were not as formidable looking and the girls were plain.
The different characters did stick out pretty well; humans, mutants, vampires and the like all were different in their
own way. The punks looked like rockers from the 1980s and the backgrounds of fighting sequences were done in tie-dye
and flashing lights. You could tell when the movie was made by looking at those common errors in older anime. The low
number of overly bright colors they used clash terribly with everything in the film.
On a positive note, the movie is unlike many older films (Ex. Akira), which at times could be difficult discerning a guy
from a girl except from the voice; Vampire Hunter D makes sure you know who is who and what is what. The art isn't
what I'd call excellent, but it was good enough to sit through and watch for some enjoyment. The characters are
not drawn in detail except for shadows and age lines. I found this to be a major disappointment, since I've been
spoiled on highly detailed and intricate costumes of today's more modern anime.
The animation itself was not a fluid as it should've or could've been, but it wasn't so bad you had to
stop the movie. You just needed to get used to the fact that it was an older movie and animation wasn't what it is
today. One moment they'd show you the hero, next frame, the villain and then back and forth throughout the fight
or dialogue. It would flash back and forth so fast, sometimes making you sick if you're not used to it or ready
for it. At times the repetitve flashing was so bad enough to subliminally say, "Start your seizures now!!!" The background and moving frames were also used over and over again
throughout the movie, seriously reducing its aesthetic value. They tried; but like I said, they also had a low
budget.
Rating: 4
Sound
The sound was nothing to be impressed by. It was very old school with the corny synthesized sounds. Now, if you
thought the music synthesizer in the movie Dune was cool, then
you'd enjoy that classic 80s soundtrack. For me, the sound was just awful.
Voice acting was about the same, old and unoriginal. D, who is stoic and supposed to be quiet, was fine; other more
active speakers were not really notable and their lack of effort in their acting made the movie not as enjoyable as it
could've been.
Rating: 3
Presentation
It was an enjoyable classic because of its timeless story. That's why I made the effort to watch it. I ended up
liking it pretty well. I think overall the movie was a success for its time. I also think they did the best that they
could for their time and for what they could afford. I believe that Hideyuki Kikuchi is a great author and if he could
do it all over again, he most definitely would. Kikuchi had a wonderful imagination and helped jumpstart science
fiction novels and anime in Japan. Many current works have been influenced by his original novels. I rated this movie
higher overall because it was a decent attempt for its time at a good story.
I also blame any current lack of interest in watching this cult classic envisioned by its imaginative author, on those
current writers who've copied his original stories.
Rating: 6
Final Verdict
4.8333 (moderate)
Reviewed by yothsothgoth, Jul 21, 2008